NRI Legal Services Punjab – What to deal with property concerning legal issues in succession problems without coming to India by Simranjeet Law Associates – Top NRI Legal Services Secrets
Thus „mere propensity“ to commit offences of the kind charged may now be admissible. Mr Benson QC, who appears for Mr Edwards, also NRI submits that the implication of the rule in the present case would be inconsistent with the decision of the Court of Appeal in British Telecommunications. In a supplementary affidavit filed on October 28, 1964, the appellant further stated that the order of the Assistant Registrar was mala fide in that at the time when it was made the Assistant Registrar was due for transfer and NRI Lawyers he had picked out two or three cases out of about fifty pending before him.
Experience shows that it is simply not possible to identify a more helpful or rigorous test. Article 7 goes on to provide that „The compensation shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of article 1“ of the Second Directive (as to which see para 7 above). Having quoted para 52 of the Stec case 43 EHRR 47 he observed, at para 56, that this was ‘an area where the court should be very slow to substitute its view for that of the executive, especially as NRI Lawyers the discrimination is not on one of the express, or primary grounds’.
He concluded, at para 57: He went on to say that it was not possible to characterise the views taken by the executive as ‘unreasonable’“. In any event, the issue was very different, namely whether, in a case where it was (rightly) common ground that the rule did not apply, a landlord would be in breach the moment disrepair occurs, or whether he would be in breach only after the expiry of a reasonable time to remedy the disrepair.
“ The bank filed an application in the Patna High Court on August 14, 1964 for starting proceedings in contempt against the appellant. 14,288-13-9 while holding the appellant liable for the entire amount without examining the up-to-date position of payment of the amounts for which the claim had been preferred. It may be proved by convictions for offences of the same description or nrilegalservices category, but also by other evidence, such as that of complainants or observers, or by past admissions where there has not been a conviction.
The appellant filed a petition showing cause and in grounds 29 and NRI 30 of his petition, he asserted NRI Lawyers that he was within 166 his legitimate right to call the decision of the Assistant Registrar mala fide for the reasons given and that he had the right to criticise the discriminatory order of the Assistant Registrar as the said officer had laid down two standards in judging the alleged liability of himself and Sri Jagannath Jha by exonerating Jagannath Jha from the liability for the entire amount of Rs.
Article 25(1) says that it will be provided „in accordance with the provisions of articles 9 and 10“ of the Sixth Directive, which relate respectively to the requirements on member states to ensure compulsory insurance in minimum amounts and to set up or authorise a compensation body to cover property damage or personal injuries caused by an unidentified or uninsured vehicle (see para 7 above). I must admit that I was initially not attracted by this approach because it seemed close to giving a discretion to judges when it comes to deciding how to deal with a claim based on a contract with an illegal element.
When considering whether it is possible to give more specific or firm guidance, I have considered some examples, which ultimately have helped to persuade me that greater clarity, strictness or specificity is simply not possible, at any rate at this stage, and they have served to conform the aptness of the approach set out in para 101 above. It is true that the tenant in that case may have had rights in respect of that part, but it was not a right to be frequently present on, a right frequently to use physically (if not to occupy), the property out of repair, as in the present NRI case.
The same test was applied NRI Legal services by Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury (with whom Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe and Lord Rodger of Earlsferry agreed) in R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] AC 311, which concerned the denial of income support disability premium to rough sleepers. (e) a provision entitling an injured party to apply for compensation to the compensation body in the member state if „it is impossible to identify the vehicle or if, within two months following the accident, it is impossible to identify the insurance undertaking“: article 7 (now article 25(1) of the Sixth Directive).
2 responsible mainly for such costs. It is prayed that it should be declared that the order of the Assistant Registrar is without jurisdiction, illegal and mala fide and heavy costs should be awarded making respondent No. However, on further reflection, it appears to me that, unlike the multi-factorial approach proposed by Professor Burrows, the structured approach proposed by Lord Toulson is not akin in practice to a discretion, and, in any event, it is the best guidance that can sensibly be offered at the moment.
That case was concerned with disrepair to part of the exterior of a building on the fifth floor. „it shall comply with all applicable laws, regulations and codes of practice from time to time in force … and each party indemnifies the other against all loss, damages, claims, costs and expenses … which the other party may suffer or incur as a result of any breach by it of this undertaking.
