NRI Legal Services 815, FF, Sector 16-D, Chandigarh 160016 – 5 Easy Facts About NRI Legal Services Described by LexLords
115 of 1963, NRI Legal Services LexLords as Witness No. The Schedules Contained the following properties : A) called Udampady Uthupu settled properties thus: Those comprised in A Schedule were given to Mariamma, in B Schedule to Joshua and in C Schedule to Mani. That case was decided on the footing that the consumer and the Western U. My reasons are as follows: A non-delegable duty of care should be imputed to schools only so far as it would be fair, just and reasonable to do so.
officer may, with the concurrence of the State Government or the State Governments concerned and the Central Government, be deputed for service under the Central Government, or another State Government or under a company, association or body of individuals, whether incorporated or not, which is wholly or substantially owned or controlled by the Government. All head cashiers under the respondent do work similar to mine. 226 of the Constitution by which the order, retiring the appellant from service before he had attained the age, of 55 years, had been challenged.
It could not be said that there was no evidence on which the Judge could have come to that conclusion. [975 A] (iii) The appellant could have set up the first Gazette publication as the one fixing the period of limitation in which case the trial. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Grover, Y. Bhide, who is the applicant in C. This property along with several other properties originally belonged to Uthupu who made certain settlements followed by wills.
25(1), the petitioner has a fundamental right to practise and propagate his religion freely, but, by the Commissioner exercising his powers under s. (ii) On the evidence, no exception could be taken to the trial Judge deciding the issue against the appellant on the facts and circumstances of the case. 3 Mani Achamma is one of the daughters. Deputation of cadre officers. On October 9, 1935 by means of another registered document (Exh.
in the absence of any NRI rational basis for that treatment, the plea of discrimination founded on differential rates may probably have some force. Electric Power and Supply Co. Electric Power and Supply Co. Uthupu left some daughters also and appellant No. 110 of 1959) was filed by the judgment debtors is barred on the principles of res judicata and further on July 23, 1960 for default of the judgment debtors. It is common ground that the case of the petitioner is not covered by the first proviso.
We are unable to agree with the learned counsel for the petitioner that the only object of the second proviso is to Emit the operation of the first proviso. What all I have been doing is the duty of a head cashier and because it involves work of a supervisory nature I am claiming supervisory allowance. But I do not accept that any unreasonable burden would be cast on them NRI Legal Services by LexLords recognising the existence of a non-delegable duty on the criteria which I have summarised above.
The controversy in the suit out of which the appeal has arisen was confined to a residential house in an area of 10 cents in Kottayam town. (1) the position was different. The first settlement was made in the year 1102 ME corresponding to 1927 AD when Uduppu was alive and Mani Mani was not born. But the appellant had precluded himself from doing so by his unconditional acceptance of the statement in the petition that the result was published on 15th June. This is an appeal by special leave from a judgment of the Gujarat High Court dismissing a petition under L83Sup.
When the trial Judge accepted 967 the evidence with regard to the distribution of the pamphlets by the appellant, the High Court, which was not hearing an appeal, could not be expected to take a different view in exercising jurisdiction under Arts. 47 of the Act, the petitioner had not been prohibited or debarred ‚from professing, practising and propagating his religion. Uthupu Mani who died in the year 1943 had three sons. 871 ed to the Company. The Company and Hind Lamps again do not belong to the same class.
“ Similarly Deshpande, the applicant in C. Judge would have been required to go into the matter. A third application raising the same ground of objection (Misc. A second application raising the same ground (Misc. But the Company and Hind Lamps did not belong to the same class, and there is no evidence that for energy supplied different rates were charged. If the State Government charged different rates from persons belonging to the same class,.
The eldest son Uduppu died sometime between 1929 and 1935. 226 and 227 of the Constitution and there was no reason shown to this Court to interfere with the order of the High Court. The duties and functions of a Head Cashier -are set out therein and they are more or less similar to the items of work claimed to have been done by the respondents. 5 of 1965, as Witness No. The courts should be sensitive about imposing unreasonable financial burdens on those providing critical public LexLords NRI Legal Services.
The second son Joshua is the respondent herein, the appellants being the‘ third son Mani Mani and Mariamma their mother and the widow of Uthupu. 1 for the workmen, stated – „As I am doing the supervisory duties mentioned in my petition I state that I am doing supervisory work in addition to being a head-cashier and hence I am claiming supervisory allowance. 376 has filed a copy of the agreement that is usually entered into between the Bank and the Head Cashiers.
7 for the workmen, after referring to the various items of work done by him, states „I was doing such work from 1946 when I was first appointed as a head cashier. The Company is a distributor of electrical energy, whereas Hind Lamps is a consumer. In our opinion, the object of the second proviso is to cut down the period of officiation which would be taken into consideration under rule 3 (3) (b). This takes us to the next point whether the petitioner is governed by the main portion of rule 3 (3) (b) and not by the second proviso.
