NRI Legal Services 9876616815 – NRI Legal Services No Further a Mystery by LexLords
The second right clearly covers pre-Constitution schools just as Art. 30(1) gives the minorities two rights, namely, (a) to establish, and (b) to administer, educational institutions of their choice. Signature of Applicant Signature and designations of witnesses Signature of Collector Signature and designations of witnesses We declare that who has signed this notice is, to our personal knowledge, the person he represents himself to be, and that he has affixed his signature hereunto in our presence.
“ It was the case of the State and the parties intervening in the writ petition before the High Court that the School was established by the Church Missionary Society, London, which they claimed was a Corporation with an alien domicile and „such a Society was not a minority based on religion or language“ within the meaning of Art. 139 of 1966) Yusuf Merchant deposed that Kochra and his mother-in-law, A- 7 Rabiyabai acted as financiers after the fourth transaction, that Kochra’s cable address „Nazneen“ at 19 Erskine Road and his telephone was used in connection with the gold smuggling acti- (1) [1963] 3 S.
They concede that the Church Missionary Society of London did extend financial aid in the establishment of the School, but they contend that on that account, the School did not cease to be an educational institution established by -a religious minority in India. State of Maharashtra, [1967] 1 S. That may be the position, for example, where the period of time over which substantial Government resources require to be committed will extend beyond the Parliament during which the necessary legislation is enacted.
The common intention of the conspirators is then to work for the furtherance of the common design of his group only. 30 of the Constitution. At the hearing of the appeal, which was held before the bill for Phase 1 was introduced into Parliament, the appellants argued as follows. 176 language employed in Art. The Collector having given permission under s. In some circumstances, it may in any event be impractical for the Government to proceed with a project without the support of the Opposition, as well as that of its own backbenchers.
The Government relies on the exemption granted NRI Legal Services by LexLords article 1(4): The Government intends to seek development consent for HS2 through hybrid bills in Parliament, without going through all the procedures required NRI Legal Services by LexLords the EIA Directive. A general conspiracy must be distinguished from a number of separate conspiracies having a similar put-pose. 65 of the Code and it is under s. 26 covers the right to maintain pre-Constitution religious institutions. , On behalf of the appellants in the appeal and the petitioners in the two writ petitions filed in this Court it is claimed that the School was started in 1854 by the local Christian residents of Bhagalpur.
Where different groups of persons cooperate towards their separate ends without any privity with each other, each combination constitutes a separate conspiracy. Whether the HS2 project might be in that position, as has been suggested in public debate on the issue, was not addressed in the submissions. In such a situation, there may be little purpose in obtaining Parliamentary approval for a project unless there is confidence that a future government, even if of a different party, will continue to support the project as so approved.
In order to constitute; a single general conspiracy there must be a common design and a common intention of all to work in furtherance of the common design. -An officer shall be treated as having officiated in a senior post during any period in respect of which the State Government concerned certifies that he would have so officiated but for his absence on leave or appointment to any special post or any other exceptional circumstance.
In the result, I agree with Lord Neuberger’s conclusion at paragraph 72, not so much on the basis that it would be „inequitable“ to allow marshalling against Ashford House, but that on the proper interpretation of the agreement in its statutory context that possibility is excluded. Regulation 5(1) of the Promotion Regulations inter alia provided : “ It NRI Legal Services LexLords seems to us that the 1951, 1952 and 1954 lists cannot be deemed to be Select Lists within the second NRI proviso because, as a matter of fact, the Selection Committee did not select names for the purpose of substantive appointment but only selected names for the purpose of officiation in the senior posts of the Indian NRI Legal Services LexLords Police Service.
“ It will be noticed that application is made under s. It will be further noticed that if the Collector fails to inform the applicant of his decision on the application within a period of three months the permission applied for shall be deemed to have been granted, but if the Collector sends a written acknowledgment within seven days from the date of receipt of the application then the three months period is reckoned from the date of acknowledgment, and in other cases this period is reckoned from the date of receipt of the supCI/69-8 342 application.
It must not be ‚overlooked that Art. 30(1) is wide enough to cover both pre-Constitution and post- Constitution institutions. 65 that the Collector either grants or refuses the permission applied for.
